This post was reblogged from BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER..
‘Dude, I dig Zooey Deschanel’ T Shirt
OH MY GOD NO WAY. thats like our whole site on a shirt.
thesteve
This post was reblogged from BONER PARTY!!!.
This post was reblogged from BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER..
6od:
thesteveBoth times we’ve driven to San Diego, Paul had nicknamed the following, “the boobies.” I love the immaturity.Not to discredit Paul or anything, but anyone who has driven to San Diego knows these as “The Boobs”. And I capitalize that because it’s sort of a landmark. It’s a common point of reference. Like, “Hey, how far away are you?”, your answer would typically be, “I’m not really sure, but I just past The Boobs.” And they will know exactly what you’re talking about.
This post was reblogged from *bare with me.
“I saw then what I should have seen long before: namely that our friendship had ripened to a point when we had already become in a way part-owners of each other.”
This post was reblogged from nightmare brunette.
This post was reblogged from Melissa Gira Grant.
“Well you done done me and you bet I felt it
I tried to be chill but you’re so hot that I melted
I fell right through the cracks”
This post was reblogged from Live.to.the.point.of.tears.
This post was reblogged from Suicide Blonde.
This post was reblogged from Marcia is Amused..
“Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer’s reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions.”
This post was reblogged from BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER..
This post was reblogged from BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER..
This post was reblogged from BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER..
Gladwell reviews Chris Anderson’s “Free: The Future of a Radical Price” (via) (via ryanbrown)
I agree with this to a degree, because there is a great deal of crap on YouTube, but there is plenty of user-generated content I would be willing to pay for. I’m willing to pay for it because often user-generated content is more interesting than professionally produced content, such as television shows and movies. Professionals create a great deal of crap, which is why television audiences are shrinking and online audiences are growing.
(via soupsoup)
thesteve“So how does YouTube bring in revenue? Well, it tries to sell advertisements alongside its videos. The problem is that the videos attracted by psychological Free—pirated material, cat videos, and other forms of user-generated content—are not the sort of thing that advertisers want to be associated with. In order to sell advertising, YouTube has had to buy the rights to professionally produced content, such as television shows and movies. Credit Suisse put the cost of those licenses in 2009 at roughly two hundred and sixty million dollars. For Anderson, YouTube illustrates the principle that Free removes the necessity of aesthetic judgment. (As he puts it, YouTube proves that “crap is in the eye of the beholder.”) But, in order to make money, YouTube has been obliged to pay for programs that aren’t crap. To recap: YouTube is a great example of Free, except that Free technology ends up not being Free because of the way consumers respond to Free, fatally compromising YouTube’s ability to make money around Free, and forcing it to retreat from the “abundance thinking” that lies at the heart of Free. Credit Suisse estimates that YouTube will lose close to half a billion dollars this year. If it were a bank, it would be eligible for TARP funds.”
This post was reblogged from Soup.
← Older Entries Page 1 of 109